Prevalence and Association between Primary Stability and Bone Quality in Implants Placed in Edentulous Dental Arches: A Retrospective Analysis.

Immediate function has become an accepted treatment modality for fixed restorations in completely edentulous jaws. The dental implants have gained immense popularity. A secure implant primary stability is positively associated with a successful implant integration and long term successful clinical outcome. The main aim of this study was to find the association between primary stability and bone density in implants placed in maxilla and mandible. A total of 1263 patients who had undergone implant placement from March 2020-March 2021 in Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai, India were chosen for the study. The primary stability and bone density of these patients were collected from the hospital records. The collected data was compiled, reviewed, tabulated in Microsoft Excel sheet and entered in SPSS software for statistical analysis. In the present study, the patient aged between 28 and 37 years had undergone more implant placement (31%) with male predilection (53%). The most commonly associated primary stability was found to be 30-40 Ncm (51.37%) predominantly with D2 type of bone density (52.69%). A Chi-squared statistical test was done for primary stability and bone density and the P was found to be 0.00 (Chi-squared P < 0.05, statistically significant). The most predominant bone density was D2 associated with primary stability of 30-40 Ncm. The association between bone density and primary stability was found to be statistically significant. The present study shows a strong relationship between bone density and primary implant stability.

Severity of mandibular arch crowding in different sagittal malocclusions.

Mandibular anterior crowding is caused by a variety of factors. Mandibular incisor crowding can be caused by a number of causes including incisor and molar inclination, early loss of deciduous molars, mandibular growth, and oral musculature. The study was aimed to perform an association of the lower anterior crowding severity with gender and type of malocclusion. The current study was performed in a hospital setup and data about mandibular arch crowding patients were collected from the Records management system of a Private Dental Hospital in Chennai city. All the patient data on Mandibular arch crowding were sourced and tabulated after which statistical analysis with SPSS-IBM was done. Data collection was done over a period from June 2019 to February 2021. The entire study sample size was 634 case records. The result obtained from the statistical analysis was found that nearly 46% of the patients were found to have Mandibular arch crowding with female predilection (50%). The most commonly associated age groups were children than adults (63.2%) associated with mild type of crowding (65.1%). The most commonly involved malocclusion was found to be Class 1 (88.4%) Mild imbrications of the lower arch were common and were seen mainly in subjects with Class I malocclusion. Female subjects presented with more prevalence of mandibular arch crowding when compared to male subjects. Children were more affected by crowding than adults.

Comparing Closed Tray Implant Impression Techniques Using Snap-On and Impression Analogues on a Clinical Radiographic Scale.

Several impression techniques have been proposed to achieve passive fitness between the prosthesis and the osseointegrated implant. The aim of this study was to compare closed tray implant impression techniques using snap-on and impression analogues on a clinical radiographic scale. The current study was comparative, descriptive, and retrospective, performed in a university setting in 2020. The data of patients reporting to the Department of Implantology between June 2019 to March 2020 were collected from patient records, and the data of 1000 plus patients were analyzed for snap-on impressions and impression analogue accuracy in seating and associated jig trial seating. A comparison of closed tray implant impression techniques using snap-on and impression analogues on a clinical radiographic scale found both to be perfect. The impression recorded with snappy with abutment and the impression recorded using impression coping exhibited no differences during jig trial seating verification. This study showed that both impression procedures are accurate and can be used for implant impressions.